The direction, strength, and color (temperature) of light affects the way viewers see the subject. Seeing this forest hiking trail log on a rainy day, or one mixed with cloud and clear sky would present a much different subject, probably scarcely noticed while walking by. But in the afternoon light of a cloudless sky and the sun positioned almost directly overhead, this old tree trunk stands out from the deep shadow of the surrounding forest floor. Its dramatic look is partly from the contrast of bright light to surrounding shadow, as if a strong spotlight were showing off the rough old surface. But the look also comes from the direction of the dominant light source in relation to lens position.
This photo of the fallen tree weathered by seasons of freezing and thawing, wind and the ravages of various living things, both plant and animal, has strong light from directly overhead. There is no moderating layer of haze or cloud cover: sun on rough wood shows every detail, hiding nothing. Moving the lens to extreme right or left for an oblique view, rather than full-frontal picture, would show the same texture and detail, although the depth of focus would differ to this “flat” view in which the length of the tree trunk lies at more or less equal distance to the plane of focus, thus rendering equal clarity to all parts of the subject.
By contrast, more diffuse light from directly overhead would blanket the illumination more evenly. The texture of pits and high spots would subtly shift rather than to break abruptly from bright light to deep shadow. Even with the same strong, direct light, if instead the photo was front-lit (from behind the lens location) there would be almost no shadow; all would be brightly illuminated like headlights cast onto it. The reverse, with the sun shining toward the camera in a backlit view, would give a halo around the edges, but leave the body of the subject obscured in shadow. Then there is the sidelit look: Pronounced shadows would be elongated, showing off the textures in an exaggerated way. In all these cases, murky light or bright, positioned at the various compass points, the subject is the same; even the framing of the composition could remain the same. But by changing the light on the subject, its character overall and in the closest detail look different. In other words, “seeing in a new light” or “looking with fresh eyes” really does affect the impression that sticks in one’s mind.
The figure of speech, “putting the matter in a new light,” or “shines a light” is true not only in this photographic sense, but in mental vision, too. A person forms a picture in mind by layers of impressions coming 2nd hand from others (hearsay) and from direct experience, too. The look of that impression depends greatly on the light in which the matter is seen. So before coming to a conclusion, pause to look at the lighting: is the subject standing in flattering light? Harsh light? Weak light? Surely, the source and the location of the illumination sources relative to the eye (or mind) of the viewer affects the experience.